A Hero and Some Other Folks — A Closer Reading
Edition facts
The catalog record for A Hero and Some Other Folks — A Closer Reading provides practical reading context through 87,770 words, 6 hr 22 min estimated reading time, and 7 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Essays,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Ulysses was shrewd, brave, balanced--possibly, though not conclusively, patriotic--a sort of Louis XI, so far as we may form an estimate, but no more. He was selfish, immoral, barren of finer instincts, who was loved by his dog and by Penelope, though for no reason we can discover. Ten years he fought before Troy, and ten years he tasted the irony of the seas--in these episodes displaying bravery and fortitude, but no homesick love for Penelope, who waited at the tower of Ithaca for him, a picture of constancy sweet enough to hang on the palace walls of all these centuries. We do not think to love Ulysses, nor can we work ourselves up to the point of admiration; and he is the best hero classic Rome and Greece can offer. No! Register, as the modern sense of the classic hero, we do not like him.
He is not admirable, yet is not totally lacking in power to command attention. What is his quality of appeal to us? This: He is action; and action thrills us. The old hero was, in general, brave and brilliant. He had the tornado's movement. His onset redeems him. He blustered, was spectacular, heartless, and did not guess the meaning of purity; but he was warrior, and the world enjoys soldiers. And this motley hero has been attempted in our own days. He was archaic, but certain have attempted to make him modern. Byron's Don Juan is the old hero, only lost to the old hero's courage. He is a villain, with not sense enough to understand he is unattractive. He is a libertine at large, who thinks himself a gentleman. Don Juan is as immoral, impervious to honor, and as villainous as the Greek gods. The D'Artagnan romances have attempted the old hero's resuscitation. The movement of the "Three Musketeers" is mechanical rather than human. D'Artagnan's honor is limited to his fealty to his king. He has no more sense of delicacy toward women, or honor for them as women, than Achilles had. Some of his doings are too defamatory to be thought of, much less mentioned. No! Excuse me from D'Artagnan and the rest of Dumas' heroes. They may be French, but they are not heroic. About Dumas' romances there is a gallop which, with the unwary, passes for action and art. But he has not, of his own motion, conceived a single woman who was not seduced or seducible, nor a single man who was not a libertine; for "The Son of Porthros" [Transcriber's note: Porthos?] and his bride are not of Dumas' creation. He is not open to the charge of having drawn the picture of one pure man or woman. Zola is the natural goal of Dumas; and we enjoy neither the route nor the terminus. Louis XIV, Charles II, and George IV are modeled after the old licentious pretense at manhood, but we may all rejoice that they deceive nobody now. Our civilization has outgrown them, and will not, even in second childhood, take to such playthings.
William A. Quayle opens A Hero and Some Other Folks with a declaration that the hero is not a luxury but a necessity, immediately establishing a tone of moral earnestness. He invokes Emerson and Lowell to frame hero-worship as a universal impulse, then pivots to critique classical heroes like Ulysses and Aeneas, whom he dismisses as outdated. This opening essay sets a pattern: Quayle blends personal conviction with literary reference, often challenging received opinion. The reader should note how he uses the first essay to define his own critical stance—admiring modern heroes like Jean Valjean over ancient ones—before moving to broader subjects.
The Rhetoric of Heroism
In the first essay, Quayle’s prose is declarative and aphoristic: “The hero is not a luxury, but a necessity.” He relies on contrast—old heroes versus new—and on quoted authority, such as Lowell’s lines about freedom. The reader should observe how Quayle’s voice shifts between preacher and critic. He does not merely describe Jean Valjean but uses him as a type of modern heroism, implicitly arguing that literature’s function is to elevate. The opening paragraph’s rhythm, with its short clauses and exclamatory tone, signals a writer who aims to persuade rather than inform.
Shakespeare and the Iconoclasts
Later in the volume, Quayle turns to the Shakespeare authorship question, a topic that allows him to display his own method. He summarizes the arguments of Delia Bacon, Donnelly, and others, then counters them not with new evidence but with appeals to genius: “Genius knows no rules.” This section reveals Quayle’s willingness to engage with contemporary controversies. He treats the anti-Stratfordian position with respect—calling Donnelly “a man of ingenuity”—before dismissing it as implausible. The reader should note how Quayle balances skepticism toward iconoclasm with admiration for the iconoclasts’ energy.
Structure and Transition
The book’s table of contents shows a deliberate arc: from Jean Valjean to Shakespeare, Caliban, William the Silent, and then to American geography, iconoclasm, Tennyson, historians, King Arthur, and the gentleman in literature. This is not a random collection. Quayle moves from individual heroes to broader cultural topics, then to literary criticism and historical figures. The reader should watch for how each essay builds on the previous one. For instance, the essay on iconoclasm in nineteenth-century literature follows naturally from the Shakespeare discussion, extending the theme of challenging established reputations.
Quayle’s Use of Examples
Throughout the excerpts, Quayle draws on a wide range of references: classical epics, Victorian poetry, American historians, and biblical drama. He assumes a literate audience familiar with Ulysses, Aeneas, and the works of Tennyson. Yet his examples are not mere decoration; they serve to illustrate his arguments about heroism, genius, and cultural change. The reader should pay attention to how Quayle selects details—for instance, calling Aeneas a “big cry-baby”—to make his points vivid. This technique keeps the essays lively even when the subject matter is academic.
As you read through A Hero and Some Other Folks, notice how Quayle’s voice evolves from the assertive preacher of the first essay to the more measured critic of later pieces. The book rewards attention to its structure: each essay contributes to a coherent argument about the value of heroism and the dangers of uncritical iconoclasm. Quayle writes not as a scholar but as a public intellectual, eager to engage his readers in a conversation about literature and life.
I’ve spent many evenings with A Hero and Some Other Folks, watching Quayle soften from devotion to doubt. Its later essays remind me of a quiet old friend, Thoughts Suggested by Mr. Froude's "Progress" — Reading Notes, which likewise lays down a hero’s laurels with a sigh. There’s a kinship in that gentle shedding of certainty—each book, in its own time, simply holds the door open.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.