Humanly Speaking — Themes and Context
Edition facts
For Humanly Speaking — Themes and Context, the stored edition analysis reports 48,118 words, 3 hr 30 min estimated reading time, and 5 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 16.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Essays,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Bagster looked vaguely troubled. "There is no such thing as an isolated moral phenomenon," he said, as if he were repeating something from a former sermon; "when you attempt to remedy one evil you find it related to a whole moral series. But perhaps I did not make the connection plain. My address doesn't seem to be as closely reasoned as it did when I was delivering it. Does it seem to you to be cogent?"
"Cogent is not precisely the word I would use. But it seems earnest."
"Thank you," said Bagster. "I always try to be earnest. It's hard to be earnest about so many things. I am always afraid that I may not give to all an equal emphasis."
"And now that you have stopped for a moment," I suggested, "perhaps you would be willing to skip to the last page. When I read a story I am always anxious to get to the end. I should like to know how your address comes out,--if it does come out."
Bagster turned over a dozen pages and read in a more animated manner.
"Your chairman has the reputation of making the meetings over which he presides brisk and crisp. He has given me just a minute and a half in which to tell what the country expects of this Federation of Young People. I shall not take all the time. I ask you to remember two letters--E and N. _What_ does the country expect this Federation to do? E--everything. _When_ does the country expect you to do it? N--now. Remember these two letters--E and N. Young people, I thank you for your attention.
"The hour is late. You, my young brother, have listened to a charge in which your urgent duties have been fearlessly declared to you. When you have performed these duties, others will be presented to you. And now, in token of our confidence in you, I give you the right hand of fellowship.
"And do you know," said Bagster, "that when I reached to give him the right hand of fellowship, he wasn't there."
We sat in silence for some time. At last he asked, hesitatingly, "What do you think of it? In your judgment is it organic or functional?"
"I do not think it is organic. I am afraid that your conscience has been over-functioning of late, and needs a rest. I know a nook in the woods of New Hampshire, under the shadow of Mount Chocorua, where you might go for six months while your affairs are in the hands of a receiver. I can't say that you would find everything satisfactory, even there. The mountain is not what it used to be. It is decadent, geologically speaking, and it suffered a good deal during the last glacial period. But you can't do much about it in six months. You might take it just as it is,--some things have to be taken that way.
"You will start to-morrow morning and begin your life of temporary irresponsibility. You will have to give up your problems for six months, but you may rest assured that they will keep. You will go by Portsmouth, where you will have ten minutes for lunch. Take that occasion for a leisurely meal. A card will be handed to you assuring you that 'The bell will ring one minute before the departure of the train. You can't get left.' Hold that thought: you can't get left; the railroad authorities say so."
"Did you ever try it," asked Bagster.
"And did you get left?"
"Portsmouth," I said, "is a beautiful old town. I had always wanted to see it. You can see a good deal of Portsmouth in an afternoon."
The predicament in which my friend Bagster finds himself is a very common one. It is no longer true that the good die young; they become prematurely middle-aged. In these days conscience doth make neurasthenics of us all. Now it will not do to flout conscience, and by shutting our eyes to the urgencies and complexities of life purchase for ourselves a selfish calm. Neither do we like the idea of neurasthenia.
My notion is that the twentieth-century man is morally solvent, though he is temporarily embarrassed. He will find himself if he is given sufficient time. In the mean time it is well for him to consider the nature of his embarrassment. He has discovered that the world is "so full of a number of things," and he is disappointed that he is not as "happy as kings"--that is, as kings in the fairy books. Perhaps "sure enough" kings are not as happy as the fairy-book royalties, and perhaps the modern man is only experiencing the anxieties that belong to his new sovereignty over the world.
Samuel McChord Crothers opens his collection by seizing on the theologian's saving clause, 'humanly speaking,' and turning it into a tool for examining how people manage the gap between rigid argument and stubborn fact. The opening essay sets a tone of genial skepticism: logical machines run full speed, but real life keeps throwing indubitable facts onto the tracks. Crothers's voice is that of a spectator who enjoys watching the near-collisions—and the clever switches that prevent disaster.
Throughout the volume, he sustains this observational stance, whether dissecting the American temperament, the expectations of travelers, or the fashion for realism in literature. His prose moves at a conversational pace, often beginning with a broad claim and then narrowing to a concrete, sometimes absurd, example—like the view from the top of a London bus, where pedestrians seem doomed until the last moment.
The Switch of Common Sense
In the title essay, Crothers identifies 'humanly speaking' as a rhetorical device that allows a speaker to acknowledge exceptions without abandoning a general principle. He illustrates this with the theologian who, after building an airtight argument, encounters a fact that should derail it—but the saving clause switches the train onto a parallel track. The metaphor is characteristic: Crothers prefers mechanical images of motion and collision to abstract debate. He applies the same logic to nations: the British Empire, he notes, is 'full of anomalies and temporary makeshifts,' yet it holds together. Strictly speaking, it should not exist. But humanly speaking, it does. This tension between rational coherence and actual messiness becomes a recurring theme.
The Perils of the High Seat
One of the most vivid passages in the collection comes in the essay on travelers, where Crothers describes riding atop a London bus. From his elevated perch, he sees pedestrians and cyclists heading straight for disaster—an old gentleman, two nursemaids, a butcher's boy on a bicycle. 'There is, humanly speaking, no hope for him,' he thinks, yet the expected crunch never comes. The passage works as a miniature of Crothers's method: he sets up a scene of apparent inevitability, then undercuts it with the observation that from a lower angle—sitting with the driver—the outcome would have looked different. The shift in perspective is both literal and philosophical. He quotes the old couplet about mercy between saddle and ground, suggesting that between the pedestrian and the motor-bus there are many chances of safety that the high seat obscures.
The Toryism of the Tourist
Crothers argues that the true enemy of innovation is not the stay-at-home but the traveler. The stay-at-home, he points out, satisfies his desire for change by making small alterations—moving from the blue bed to the brown, or shingling the barn. The traveler, by contrast, becomes a 'hopeless reactionary' the moment he packs his trunk. Having paid to see a celebrated spot, he insists that it remain exactly as it was 'once upon a time.' The present inhabitants are reduced to caretakers. This observation is grounded in a specific detail: the traveler's insistence on one preserved period, with everything else put out of the way. Crothers does not condemn this impulse; he simply notes its irony. The person who seeks novelty in place becomes the most rigid conservative about time.
Crothers writes as a companionable essayist, not a systematic philosopher. His arguments unfold through anecdote and analogy rather than syllogism. Readers will find that the essays reward attention to his shifts in register—from the mock-heroic bus ride to the quiet irony of the tourist's conservatism. The collection does not build to a single conclusion; instead, it offers a series of meditations on how people manage the improbable fact of living together. Crothers's voice is consistent: urbane, amused, and alert to the gap between what we say and what we do.
I often think of Crothers’ Humanly Speaking and how gently it admitted life’s contradictions. There’s a fellow-feeling between that book and Our business civilization — Edition Insights, as if both understood that our strivings rarely match our quietest hopes. Each, in its own way, keeps vigil over the gap, and I find that a tender comfort.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.